SAU Votes to Re-Seal Minutes!

Tonight, in an astonishing development, the SAU board voted in public session to unseal and then seal again the controversial minutes of the May 12, 2016 meeting in which  Dr. Metzler was awarded his raise and bonus. Readers of this blog know there is a lawsuit filed against the district asking the court to make the minutes public, and to adjudicate a number of other Right to Know law issues.

The original single set of (sealed) non-public minutes was divided into two sets of minutes for this meeting.  The vote to unseal the first set was 10 in favor, 1 against (Dube).  The vote to unseal the second set of minutes was unanimous.

The vote to subsequently seal (again) the first set under the terrorism and security exemption was 9 in favor and 2 against (Green and Dinsmore).

The vote to seal (again) the second set of minutes concerning the superintendent’s raise and bonus under  “reputation” was 6 in favor and 5 against.  (Cirpriano, Dube, Dinsmore, Green and Spero against.)

Curiously, Mr. Collins, whose Facebook posting about the nonpublic minutes has led to a great deal of controversy and is cited in the litigation, was absent from the meeting.  He has much time for Facebook, but evidently not much time for critical votes of his elected office.  I heard there was a Red Sox game tonight.

Also absent from the meeting were Atkinson’s Jack Sapia and Sandown’s Kelly Ward.

This public session was preceded by a half hour of non-public discussion under the pending litigation exemption allowed under RSA 91-A.  An audio recording of the public session will be added to this posting within the hour.

The lawsuit is to be heard at Rockingham Superior Court at 9 a.m. on Wednesday, August 31.

In my opinion, it is an outrage that any taxpayer money is being used to defend this suit. Everyone who voted to reseal the second set of minutes should put their own money up to pursue this in court.

UPDATE: Link to the audio recording of the meeting

8/30/16 CORRECTION: Previously this posting said the hearing would be video taped by the court and later made available.  This is done by the state Supreme Court but not at the Superior Court level yet.


1 Comment

Filed under Sandown Issues

One response to “SAU Votes to Re-Seal Minutes!

  1. Mark Acciard

    Alright a few problems. 1.) the board did not have the required 2/3rds vote to seal the second set of minutes.
    2.) pay and compensation is not a “reputation” affecting detail.
    3.) While Earl is not a member of the Board, he IS a member of the Body, directly reporting to the board which further undermines the intent of the Statute.
    4.) AS USUAL, the District is WASTING taxpayer dollars to avoid producing PUBLIC INFO!!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s