My Right to Know Info on Achieve 3000

On October 16, 2016 I made a Right to Know request for information concerning the reading program Timberlane purchased in September, Achieve 3000. This story matters because the purchase of this $184,000 program was done under unusual and high pressure sales tactics at a school board meeting; furthermore, it was not disclosed to the board that Mrs. Metzler was a consultant for Achieve 3000 at the time of the purchase. Also not disclosed to the board was an additional planned purchase for $100,000 with Achieve 3000 put in the proposed 17/18 budget.

Why I made the Right to Know request

  • I learned from a filed legal deposition in the case of Carolyn Morse v. TRSD, that Mrs. Metzler was employed by Achieve 3000 sometime before mid-November 2015.
  • We know from a published LinkedIn profile that Mrs. Metzler was still engaged by Achieve 3000 in October 2016 as a “Curriculum and Implementation Consultant” for the Northeast Region.
  • The school board was not told that Mrs. Metzler was associated with Achieve 3000 when the board voted to buy the program on Sept. 15, 2016.
  • TRSD implemented a trial of Achieve 3000 in early 2016
  • Without the school board knowing -or even asking after – the results of the trial, the board purchased Achieve 3000 under intense sales pressure.  Nominal cost was $183,400 in unbudgeted expense. (Sept 15, TRSD meeting).
  • The board voted to transfer money from unknown lines to other unknown lines to pay for the purchase.

What I discovered

I learned a lot from my Right to Know request that would influence me to vote against the purchase of this program:

  • Teacher reviews of the program before the purchase brought up significant negatives which were not disclosed to the school board as a whole. Some teachers know of a free program which they believe to be superior. Negatives were massaged, if not altogether expunged, prior to a presentation to the Curriculum and Assessment Committee.
  • Not all teachers  were quick to adopt this program. Based on information given to me, a large majority of high school teachers of classes for whom this program was targeted were not using the program as of October 11.
  • An additional $100,000 was to be budgeted to roll the program out to all the elementary schools, despite the fact that the board approved the program for middle and high schools only. At last night’s board meeting (Dec.6,2016) Mr. Stokinger revealed at my prompting that yes, $100,000 was included in the proposed 17/18 Curriculum budget for Achieve 3000 in our elementary schools. The 17/18 Curriculum budget documentation shows only $10,000 for “SmartyAnts,”  an Achieve 3000 product.
  • No contract was provided to me.  Did the district approve a program with a 3 year commitment without a written contract?

More Right to Know requests have resulted 

Dec. 5, 2016

Dear Sirs and Madam:

On Dec. 1, I asked for the following information concerning Achieve 3000:
  • Grade level Achieve 3000 testing results for all grades since introduction of the program trial and implementation as provided by the program. Mr. Bealo’s response was that all test data cannot be separated from identifiable student information.  I know this to be false. I have an email dated May 24, 2016 from Mary Youngblood to Deb Armfield showing the middle school test results from January 2016 through May 2016.
  • Signed contracts for Achieve 3000 for the middle school and high school, as well as the subsequent contract for our elementary schools.
  • Any letter sent to parents to obtain permission for the data collection on their children involved in the trail of Achieve 3000 and now the implementation – as was noted as an action item in the Curriculum and Assessment meeting minutes of Feb. 16, 2016.

This information should be forthcoming by Dec. 8, 2016 to comply with 91-A. If it is not forthcoming by then I will assume there is no signed contract and that no letter was sent to parents.  This assumption would be justified in that no contracts or parental letters or other communication to parents about Achieve 3000 were included in the extensive material given to me responsive to my first Right to Know request on this matter of Oct 16, 2016.

I will also assume the district is refusing to provide me with test data aggregated by grade.

Today I am expanding my Right to Know request to ask you to provide any communication with parents at all that would authorize you to collect data on children with respect to this program. If the district did not sign a contract but instead signed a formal quote, please provide the final quotes signed.

I would also urge you to be fully forthcoming with the school board as to the efficacy of this program and your intention to roll it out into the elementary schools.

Thank you again,

Donna Green

I await a response.

Now wouldn’t it be nice if

Wouldn’t it be nice if school board members could simply ask for information and receive it without having to invoke a law that is designed as a last-resort protection for the public?

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Sandown Issues

3 responses to “My Right to Know Info on Achieve 3000

  1. Mark Acciard

    Here is the problem, UNDER LAW, Mr. Metzler has no right to refuse this information to ANYONE! let alone one of his Bosses, the SB. So, for a normal citizen like me to be refused would be bad enough a violation of law, not that I expect the law to be followed, but to refuse information to an SB or BudCom member is extraordinary. But evidently just another day in the life, of the least transparent admin since Castro.

    • Today I went back to the SAU office to re-examine the documents. There was no contract in the 800 pages but the quote has a page that requires signatures (though all copies given to me were without signatures). On this page it says by signing the district agrees to the terms of service on Achieve 3000’s website. I’ve just been reading that contract. One has to hope some one – any one – at the SAU did also, but who can possibly know?

      PS I was made to examine the documents in the waiting area even though the office immediately to my right was dark and vacant the whole time.

      • Mark Acciard

        Once again, in keeping with the District evidenced policy of making it as difficult as possible for the citizen to acquire info, to which they are entitled by law. You could have walked in with a small scanner, and scanned every page in front of them, and they can not prevent you from doing it, nor charge you for the pages.

        One SHOULD ask if Mr. Metzler makes it this hard for people to read PUBLIC INFO. What does he have to hide? I mean he has spent tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars to attempt to thwart the dissemination of public info.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s